DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JET
Docket No. NR6389-13
4 Mar 14
ee,
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 March 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this.
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 7220 Ser N130D2/13U1135
Of MME, a copy of which is attached. _
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion and determined that the contract you signed
obligating you for six years as a Nuclear-trained Machinist's
Mate is correct. The Board made no ruling on your request to
increase your Enlistment Bonus from $11,000 to $12,000, because
it was noted that your Electronic Service Record {ESR) contains
a corrected Annex C (see enclosed copy) which allows for payment
of the $12,000 bonus once you have completed training and are
designated as a Nuclear-trained Machinist’s Mate. . PERS-811 has
also confirmed you have already been paid $3,960.00 of the
$12,000 enlistment bonus. Accordingly, your application has.
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
Docket No. NR6389-13
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
TD, : RQ rem
ROBERT D. “ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure: 1. CNO Memo 7220 Ser N130D2/13U1135 of me.
2. Annex C to DD Form 4 dated Qa.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8226 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 N130D2/14U0995 of 28 July 2014 and OCNO memo 7220 N130D2/14U01313 of 8 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04500-09
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFETFRER Executive Dir Oo Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000 11606 Ser N1i30D2/ 09U0673 19 September 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORREC LIONS (OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION ICO 9 ibCmer Ref: (a) EB GENADMIN 052050Z JUL 06° (b) .Comptroller General of the United States “Decision on Case B-183576 Encl:...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10924-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 07U0226 of 12 Mar 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12670-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate {EBSR} . The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and 4salman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13396-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (RBSR), and an Enlistment Bonus for College Credit (EBCC). out in Section 6{(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05967-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS ‘701 S$. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR) . of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(¢)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09988-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/07U0110 of 10 Apr 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05882-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/06U066l of 10 Nov 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11336 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with © this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11320 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Tree Pea. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (ERSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2013 and,...